Quote (originally posted by
Black Waltz):
huh?
anyways, i'll tell you why I didn't vote for firebomb.
his sig looks rather monotonous in terms of color use. there's a splash of color here and there, but not really enough to make it "dazzle". dont really like the border. it's not that his was bad, it was actually pretty good; it's just that there were other sigs that were more appealing in design.
hope this didn't offend you, firebomb.
Oh oopsie doodles, I deserve to win the animation one because Violation's entry is too big. The still I didn't deserve to win XD
Quote (originally posted by
LadyMartel):
Stacey, you did not deserve to win this SOTW. Your entry was NOT up there with the winners. The background was ugly and the rain animation is overdone. Rain animation put into sigs like that take no artistic ability and is not what I consider to be art at all. As for your still entry, it uses the same type of background except stretched at a different angle. There is absolutely NO flow and the text looks freakishly out of place.
Simple, but well designed. Maybe you can learn something from him.
It matters unless we specifically give them an exception.
lol. Just keep living in that world. It doesn't work. There are only so many people that want to judge the SOTW and only a handful of entrants.
My animated entry was second place, the first place was too big and should have been disqualified but it wasn't. The still did not deserve to win.
Simple but well designed? No comment.
There should be no exceptions to the rules.
Randomly pick the judges everytime without giving anybody else notification, if they want to judge you can pick them or not. It should be a random pick on judges (Who should remain annonoymous), then annonoymous entries. Nobody knows who is juding or who is entering.
Last edited by
Stacey, 9:59 PM on Aug 30, 2008